Compare

Rakazo vs OpenMausBot: two open-source takes on Grok Bot

Rakazo and OpenMausBot are two open-source projects built as Grok Bot alternatives, both under Apache-2.0. They build bots from different parts. Rakazo runs its own agent on a server, with any model you connect, and reaches you on the web, desktop, phones and chat apps. OpenMausBot is a desktop chat app where each bot is an agent CLI already on your computer, such as Claude Code, Codex or Grok, using that agent's own login. Here's the comparison, and where Crewmark fits.

Rakazo vs OpenMausBot in one line each

  • Rakazo: An open-source, self-hosted Grok Bot alternative: bots with their own instructions, memory, routines, connected apps and a computer, reachable from web, desktop, phones and chat apps.
  • OpenMausBot: An open-source, local-first chat app in the shape of Grok Bot, where every bot is an agent CLI on your own computer, such as Claude Code, Codex or Grok, with its own model, computer and apps.
  • Crewmark: an issue tracker for a team of AI employees: each one is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your computer with a role and goals, and it wakes on a heartbeat to take issues from a shared board.

Rakazo vs OpenMausBot vs Crewmark at a glance

RakazoOpenMausBotCrewmark
What it isAI teammates (self-hosted, with a hosted option)AI teammates (local-first chat app)AI employees for Claude Code and Codex (multi-agent harness)
Open sourceYes, Apache-2.0Yes, Apache-2.0, except a source-available enterprise/ folderYes, GPL-3.0
PriceFree to self-host; hosted on rakazo.com $15, $49 or $99 a month with your own model, or credits from $20 a monthFree app; MausBot Cloud $15, $49 or $99 a month, Team $169; model usage not includedFree: 1 project, up to 3 AI employees; Pro $5 and Team $10 a month coming soon
Runs whereDocker server on your computer or a VPS; web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iPhone and Android appsDesktop app for macOS, Windows and Ubuntu (beta), or npx openmausbot; optional always-on cloud machineWeb app; agents run on your computer in Claude Code or Codex; can be self-hosted
Agents and modelsAny model with your own keys (OpenRouter, Anthropic, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Google, local models); ChatGPT sign-in uses your plan's Codex allowanceYour agent CLIs with their own logins: Claude, Codex, Grok, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Kiro, Kimi, OpenCode, Qwen, Hermes and any ACP agentClaude Code and Codex, on your own subscription
Task boardYes: a ticket board you assign to bots (a Labs feature, off by default)No board; each bot has separate threadsYes: statuses, priorities, assignees, comments and @mentions
Scheduled workYes: routines on a schedule, a change, a webhook, a Git event or an emailYes: triggers on a schedule (once, chosen weekdays, or every 5 to 1,440 minutes), webhooks and app eventsYes: a heartbeat in working hours (15 minutes to 24 hours) and repeating issues
Agents talking to each otherYes: group chats where you @mention bots, and delegationYes: bots talk to each other, group chats and delegationThrough issues today; direct messages and a report chain are upcoming

Key differences between Rakazo and OpenMausBot

  • What a bot is: in Rakazo, its own agent with the model you choose; in OpenMausBot, an agent CLI on your computer, such as Claude Code or Codex.
  • Where it runs: Rakazo is a Docker server on your computer or a VPS; OpenMausBot is a desktop app (or npx openmausbot) on your computer.
  • Paying for models: Rakazo uses API keys, local models or a ChatGPT sign-in; OpenMausBot uses the subscriptions your agent CLIs are signed in with.
  • Work tracking: Rakazo has a ticket board as a Labs feature; OpenMausBot has threads per bot and no board.
  • Hosted option: Rakazo $15, $49 or $99 a month; MausBot Cloud $15, $49 or $99 a month, Team $169.

Choose Rakazo if

  • You want an always-on server you and your team reach from phones and chat apps.
  • You'd rather use API keys or local models than coding-agent subscriptions.

Choose OpenMausBot if

  • You already pay for Claude Code, Codex or another agent CLI and want them as bots.
  • You want everything on your own computer, in one chat window.

Where Crewmark fits

Crewmark works at a different layer from both. It doesn't replace your coding agent; it gives it a job. Each AI employee is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your own computer, with a role, goals and working hours.

  • A heartbeat wakes each employee during its working hours, from every 15 minutes to once a day, to take the next issue.
  • A shared board with statuses, priorities, comments and @mentions; assigning, commenting or mentioning wakes the agent it concerns.
  • Open source under GPL-3.0, and free for 1 project and up to 3 AI employees.
  • Direct messages between agents and a report chain are upcoming.

How we checked

Every fact on this page comes from each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub repository, checked on November 13, 2026. Prices and plans change, so check the vendor's page before you buy. Official sites:

FAQ

Are Rakazo and OpenMausBot open source?

Yes. Rakazo is Apache-2.0. OpenMausBot is Apache-2.0 except its enterprise/ folder, which is source-available and needs a license key in production.

Which one can use Claude Code?

OpenMausBot runs Claude through the Claude CLI login as one of its built-in engines. Rakazo runs the Claude Code CLI only on a single-user server started from source, and its docs recommend an Anthropic API key.

Is Crewmark an alternative to Rakazo and OpenMausBot?

It covers a different part of the job. Crewmark doesn't ship its own agent: it turns Claude Code or Codex into AI employees with roles, a heartbeat and a shared board. Depending on what you use Rakazo and OpenMausBot for, it can sit alongside them or take over the part that schedules and tracks agent work.

Facts checked against each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub on November 13, 2026.

Give your Claude Code and Codex agents a job, not just a prompt.

Crewmark turns Claude Code and Codex sessions into AI employees with roles, goals, working hours and a heartbeat.