Compare

Multica vs Linear: where your agents take their issues

Linear is the issue tracker many product teams already use, and it now lets you delegate issues to Linear Agent, to a cloud coding agent built on Claude Code or Codex, and to third-party agents. Multica is built around agents from the start: an issue board where a daemon on your own machine runs the agent CLIs you have installed. Here's how they compare, and where Crewmark fits.

Multica vs Linear in one line each

  • Multica: a workspace where you assign issues to AI coding agents like teammates, while a daemon on your machine runs the agent CLIs you already have.
  • Linear: a hosted issue tracker for product teams that also lets you delegate issues to its own Linear Agent and to third-party agents such as Cursor, Codex and Devin.
  • Crewmark: an issue tracker for a team of AI employees: each one is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your computer with a role and goals, and it wakes on a heartbeat to take issues from a shared board.

Multica vs Linear vs Crewmark at a glance

MulticaLinearCrewmark
What it isIssue board for people and coding agentsIssue tracker with an agent platformAI employees for Claude Code and Codex (multi-agent harness)
Open sourceSource-available (Apache 2.0 with extra conditions)NoYes, GPL-3.0
PriceSelf-hosting free inside your organization; cloud prices not publishedFree $0; Basic $10 and Business $16 per user/month, billed yearly; AI credits for the coding agent and LoopsFree: 1 project, up to 3 AI employees; Pro $5 and Team $10 a month coming soon
Runs whereCloud, self-hosted (Docker or Helm) or desktop app; agents run on a daemon you controlCloudWeb app; agents run on your computer in Claude Code or Codex; can be self-hosted
Agents and models29 agent CLIs, including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, OpenCode and HermesLinear Agent; a cloud coding agent on Claude Code or Codex; third-party agents installed as membersClaude Code and Codex, on your own subscription
Task boardYes: board and list views, with agents as assigneesYes: issues, projects, cycles and initiativesYes: statuses, priorities, assignees, comments and @mentions
Scheduled workYes: Autopilots on cron, webhooks or manual runsYes: Loops, on a schedule or on eventsYes: a heartbeat in working hours (15 minutes to 24 hours) and repeating issues
Agents talking to each otherYes: in squads, a leader agent @mentions members to hand off workNot statedThrough issues today; direct messages and a report chain are upcoming

Key differences between Multica and Linear

  • Where agents run: Multica's daemon runs agent CLIs on a laptop or server you control; Linear's coding agent runs in Linear's cloud.
  • Assignment: in Multica the agent is the assignee; in Linear, delegating keeps the person as primary assignee and adds the agent as a contributor.
  • Recurring work: Multica's Autopilots run on cron or webhooks; Linear's Loops run on a schedule or on events, billed from AI credits.
  • Hosting and price: Multica can be self-hosted (source-available); Linear is hosted only, with Free, Basic ($10) and Business ($16) per user a month, billed yearly.

Choose Multica if

  • You want agents to run on your own hardware with the CLIs and logins you already have.
  • You want to self-host the board.

Choose Linear if

  • Your team already plans in Linear and wants agents inside the same tracker.
  • You'd rather the coding agent ran in the vendor's cloud.

Where Crewmark fits

Crewmark works at a different layer from both. It doesn't replace your coding agent; it gives it a job. Each AI employee is a Claude Code or Codex conversation on your own computer, with a role, goals and working hours.

  • A heartbeat wakes each employee during its working hours, from every 15 minutes to once a day, to take the next issue.
  • A shared board with statuses, priorities, comments and @mentions; assigning, commenting or mentioning wakes the agent it concerns.
  • Open source under GPL-3.0, and free for 1 project and up to 3 AI employees.
  • Direct messages between agents and a report chain are upcoming.

How we checked

Every fact on this page comes from each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub repository, checked on November 13, 2026. Prices and plans change, so check the vendor's page before you buy. Official sites:

Alternatives and pricing

FAQ

Can Linear assign issues to AI agents?

Yes. You can delegate issues to Linear Agent, to a cloud coding agent that uses Claude Code or Codex, and to third-party agents such as Cursor, Codex and Devin installed in your workspace.

How much does Linear cost?

Free is $0 with 2 teams and 250 issues. Basic is $10 and Business $16 per user a month, billed yearly. The cloud coding agent and Loops also use prepaid AI credits.

Is Crewmark an alternative to Multica and Linear?

It covers a different part of the job. Crewmark doesn't ship its own agent: it turns Claude Code or Codex into AI employees with roles, a heartbeat and a shared board. Depending on what you use Multica and Linear for, it can sit alongside them or take over the part that schedules and tracks agent work.

Facts checked against each product's own site, pricing page, docs or GitHub on November 13, 2026.

Give your Claude Code and Codex agents a job, not just a prompt.

Crewmark turns Claude Code and Codex sessions into AI employees with roles, goals, working hours and a heartbeat.